Banker's Right to Recover Money Paid by Mistake
Keywords:
Banker's right, English law, Roman-Dutch law, mistake of fact, recover money paid, Moses v Macferian, Sadler v Evans, natural justice, equity, unjust money, aequo et bono, Kelly v Solari, Standish v Ross, Sinclair v Brougham, equitable nature, unjust enrichment, condictio indebitiAbstract
The object of this article is to cover both English and Roman-Dutch law on the subject of the banker's right to recover money paid under a mistake of fact. Restitution in English law is based on a quasi-contractual action also known as an action for money had and received. In Roman Dutch law such payment is recoverable under the action condictio indebiti, a species of the enrichment actions known to that legal system. The origin of the condictio indebiti can be traced back to the classicial period of Roman Law.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2019-01-12
How to Cite
Zafrullah, H. (2019). Banker’s Right to Recover Money Paid by Mistake. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 9(1 and 2), 102–137. Retrieved from http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/15893
Issue
Section
Articles